Oct 6 – 10, 2025
TU Darmstadt
Europe/Berlin timezone

Lifetime measurements of excited states of $^{210}$Pb and $^{200}$Pt applying the two-neutron transfer reaction

Not scheduled
20m
Poster presentation Poster Session

Speaker

C. M. Nickel (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany)

Description

The r-process path of cosmic nucleosynthesis is expected to proceed partly along the $N = 126$ neutron shell closure where it contributes to the third r-process peak [1]. Improved microscopic understanding of cosmic nucleosynthesis calls for more precise and complete data on neutron-rich nuclei in the mass region around the doubly-closed shell nucleus $^{208}$Pb that serve to constrain microscopic nuclear models [2]. In particular, the $B(E2)$$\downarrow$ values of yrast transitions of $^{210}$Pb partially show discrepancies with shell model calculations. However, so far the uncertainty of the $B(E2; 2^+_1 \rightarrow 0^+_1)$ value [3] was too large to conclusively compare the experimental and theoretical results. Therefore, $^{210}$Pb was studied in an experiment at the 10 MV FN-tandem accelerator at the University of Cologne.
Furthermore, the region of the nuclear chart, where the W, Os, Pt and Hg isotopes are located, exhibits phase transitions between oblate, prolate and spherical shapes [4, 5]. The $R_{4/2}$ ratio of the energies of the $2^+_1$ and $4^+_1$ states indicates a transition from $\gamma$-softness towards sphericity for the Pt isotopic chain when approaching the neutron-shell closure at $N = 126$. $^{200}$Pt could sit at the shape-phase transitional point and was investigated at the 9 MV tandem accelerator at the IFIN-HH in Bucharest-Măgurele. Besides the $R_{4/2}$ ratio, the $B_{4/2}$ ratio of the $B(E2)$$\downarrow$ values of the $4^+_1 \rightarrow 2^+_1$ and $2^+_1 \rightarrow 0^+_1$ transitions serves as a complementary indicator for nuclear structure. However, no $B(E2)$$\downarrow$ values of $^{200}$Pt are known to date.
The $B(E2)$$\downarrow$ value is inversely proportional to the lifetime of the de-exciting state. Therefore, we performed lifetime measurements applying the recoil-distance Doppler-shift [6] method to obtain the lifetime of the $2^+_1$ state of $^{210}$Pb and the lifetimes of the $4^+_1$ and $2^+_1$ states of $^{200}$Pt.
The significantly more precise $B(E2; 2^+_1 \rightarrow 0^+_1)$ value of $^{210}$Pb enhances the comparability to shell model calculations, underlining the theoretical discrepancy to the experimental result of the $B(E2; 4^+_1 \rightarrow 2^+_1)$ value.
The first measured $B(E2)$$\downarrow$ values for $^{200}$Pt allow the calculation of the $B_{4/2}$ ratio, which shows good agreement with the theoretical limit of a spherical nucleus, indicating the structural evolution within the Pt isotopic chain.

[1] J. J. Cowan et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015002 (2021).
[2] D. Kocheva et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 175 (2017).
[3] C. Ellegaard et al., Nucl. Phys. A 162, 1 (1971).
[4] J. Jolie et al., Phys. Rev. C 68, 031301 (2003).
[5] E. Sahin et al., Phys. Lett. B 857, 138976 (2024).
[6] A. Dewald et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 786 (2012).

Primary author

C. M. Nickel (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany)

Co-authors

V. Werner (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany) G. Rainovski (Faculty of Physics, U Sofia, Bulgaria) P. R. John (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany) U. Ahmed (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany) M. Beckers (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) D. Bittner (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) A. Blazhev (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) C. Costache (IFIN-HH, Bucharest-Măgurele, Romania) A. Esmaylzadeh (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) B. Falk (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) C. Fransen (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) J. Garbe (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) L. Gerhard (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) K. Geusen (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) K. Gladnishki (Faculty of Physics, U Sofia, Bulgaria) A. Goldkuhle (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) K. E. Ide (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany) J. Jolie (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) V. Karayonchev (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) R. Kern (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany) E. Kleis (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) L. Klöckner (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) D. Kocheva (Faculty of Physics, U Sofia, Bulgaria) M. Ley (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) N. M. Mărginean (IFIN-HH, Bucharest-Măgurele, Romania) H. Mayr (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany) C. Mihai (IFIN-HH, Bucharest-Măgurele, Romania) R. E. Mihai (Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics, CTU Prague, Czech Republic) N. Pietralla (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany) F. von Spee (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) M. Steffan (Institute for Nuclear Physics, U Cologne, Germany) T. Stetz (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany) A. Weber (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany) J. Wiederhold (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany) R. Zidarova (Institute for Nuclear Physics, TU Darmstadt, Germany)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.